Nilotinib Produces High CR Rate in Treatment-Resistant CML

Article

At a median of 4.9 months of therapy with the investigational agent nilotinib (Tasigna, formerly AMN107), 92% of patients with treatment-resistant chronic phase Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) achieved a complete hematologic response with normalization of white blood cell counts, and 35% had a complete cytogenetic response. All patient had shown resistance or intolerance to optimized imatinib (Gleevec) therapy

HOUSTON—At a median of 4.9 months of therapy with the investigational agent nilotinib (Tasigna, formerly AMN107), 92% of patients with treatment-resistant chronic phase Ph+ chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) achieved a complete hematologic response with normalization of white blood cell counts, and 35% had a complete cytogenetic response. All patient had shown resistance or intolerance to optimized imatinib (Gleevec) therapy, reported Hagop Kantarjian, MD, of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and his colleagues. Dr. Kantarjian presented the results at the 2005 ASH meeting (see ONI May 2006, page 26), and updated data have now been published in the New England Journal of Medicine (354:2542-2551, 2006). The study was supported by a grant from Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Nilotinib was designed to be a highly selective inhibitor of Bcr-Abl, including 32 of its 33 mutant forms. The study enrolled 106 patients with Ph+ CML (33 in blast crisis, 56 in accelerated phase, and 17 in chronic phase). The hematologic response rate for patients in accelerated phase was 75%, with a 55% rate of cytogenetic response. For patients in blast crisis, the response rates were 39% and 27%, respectively. Nilotinib was generally well tolerated. Common adverse events included myelosuppression, transient indirect hyperbilirubinemia, and mild-to-moderate rashes. It was usually not associated with certain toxicities seen with imatinib, eg, fluid retention, edema, and weight gain, or with pleural effusions.

In the same issue of the Journal appeared results of a phase I study of dasatinib (Sprycel). [See pages 1 and 62 of ONI for reports on the FDA approval of dasatinib and results of the phase II randomized study of dasatinib vs imatinib.] "Both nilotinib and dasatinib are more potent ABL inhibitors than is imatinib and inhibit all tested imatinib-resistant mutations except T315I," said Brian J. Druker, MD, in an editorial.

Recent Videos
Barry J Byrne, MD, PhD, the chief medical advisor of MDA and a physician-scientist at the University of Florida
Barry J Byrne, MD, PhD, the chief medical advisor of MDA and a physician-scientist at the University of Florida
Sarah Larson, MD, the medical director of the Immune Effector Cell Therapy Program in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)
David Porter, MD, the director of cell therapy and transplant at Penn Medicine
David Porter, MD, the director of cell therapy and transplant at Penn Medicine
Georg Schett, MD, vice president research and chair of internal medicine at the University of Erlangen – Nuremberg
Manali Kamdar, MD, the associate professor of medicine–hematology and clinical director of lymphoma services at the University of Colorado
Manali Kamdar, MD, the associate professor of medicine–hematology and clinical director of lymphoma services at the University of Colorado
Ben Samelson-Jones, MD, PhD, assistant professor pediatric hematology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania and Associate Director, Clinical In Vivo Gene Therapy, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
Related Content
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.