Long-Term Axi-Cel Data Shows Durable Outcomes, Elucidates Drivers of Nonrelapse Mortality

News
Article

Elderly patients were at higher risk of infections and subsequent malignant neoplasms.

Michael Jain, MD, PhD, associate member, Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Department, Moffitt Cancer Center

Michael Jain, MD, PhD, associate member, Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Department, Moffitt Cancer Center

New, long-term research on outcomes with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated sustained, durable response in participants with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) 5 years after treatment but has also called attention to issues that reduce long-term survival, particularly in elderly patients.1

“Our research shows that axi-cel can provide durable, long-lasting responses in a substantial portion of patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma,” lead study author Michael Jain, MD, PhD, associate member, Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Department, Moffitt Cancer Center, said in a statement.2 “This is noteworthy given the limited options available for these patients previously.”

The retrospective analysis, published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, was led by Moffitt Cancer Center and included data from a consortium of 16 other US academic cancer centers. The analysis reported on 298 patients who were leukapheresed with the intent to receive standard-of-care axi-cel (n = 275 infused) after 2 or more previous lines of therapy, with extended follow-up data to a mean of 58 months.1

Jain and colleagues found that axi-cel yielded outcomes in the standard-of-care setting consistent with those reported in clinical trials up to 5 years. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 29% and overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 40%. The 5-year lymphoma-specific survival was 53% with infrequent late relapses.1

READ MORE: FDA Modifies CAR-T Risk Strategies to Lower Healthcare Burden

“While axi-cel is a powerful therapy, our findings underscore the need for ongoing monitoring and supportive care, particularly for older patients,” Jain added.2 “Infections and secondary cancers are significant challenges that must be addressed to improve overall patient outcomes.”

However, investigators found that late infections and the development of subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) reduced survival, with a 5-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate of 16.2%. Late NRM was mainly due to infections and SMNs (n = 24; 9%). SNMs included therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (n = 15), solid tumors (n = 7), and unrelated lymphoid malignancies (n = 2). Over half of NRM events occurred beyond 2 years. Patients who were 60 years and older had a lower risk of relapse (P = .02), but a higher risk of NRM compared with patients younger than 60 years (NRM odds ratio, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.1 to 10.8]; P < .001).1

“This study highlights the importance of personalized follow-up care and proactive management of potential complications. Our goal is to enhance patients’ long-term quality of life receiving CAR T-cell therapies,” Jain added.2

The research aligns with a recent study published in Blood Advances examining monitoring practices after CAR T-cell therapy. The research, led by first author Nausheen Ahmed, MD, Associate Professor, Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, and Assistant Director, Cellular Therapeutics, and Medical Director, BMT Survivorship Program, University of Kansas Medical Center, found that instances of cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were rare after 14 days post-infusion. However, NRM in treated patients up to 90 days after infusion was driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28), then by infection through 3 months post-infusion (1.2%).3

REFERENCES

1. Jain MD, Spiegel JY, Nastoupil LJ, et al. Five-Year Follow-Up of Standard-of-Care AxicabtageneCiloleucel for Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results From the US Lymphoma CAR T Consortium. J Clin Oncol. Published online August 2, 2024. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02786
2. Moffitt Consortium Study Answers Questions About Long-Term Survivorship Following CAR T Treatment. News release. Moffitt Cancer Center. August 5, 2024. https://www.moffitt.org/newsroom/news-releases/moffitt-consortium-study-answers-questions-about-long-term-survivorship-following-car-t-treatment/
3. Ahmed N, Wesson W, Lutfi F, et al. Optimizing the Post-CAR T Monitoring Period for Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel. Blood Adv. Published online July 23, 2024. Doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012549

Recent Videos
Chun-Yu Chen, PhD, a research scientist at Seattle Children’s Research Institute
Michael Severino on In Vivo Gene Editing With RNA Gene Writers
Chris Wright, MD, PhD, on Annelloviruses, a Potential Alternative to AAV for Gene Therapy
Carol Miao, PhD, a principal investigator at Seattle Children’s Research Institute
Jacques Galipeau, MD, on Exponential Progress With Cell and Gene Therapy
Carol Miao, PhD, a principal investigator at Seattle Children’s Research Institute
Manali Kamdar, MD, on Liso-Cel's Ongoing Benefit in the Treatment Lanscape for LBCL
Manali Kamdar, MD, on The Importance of Bringing Liso-Cel to Earlier Lines of Lymphoma Treatment
Lisa Nieland on Slowing Tumor Growth in Glioblastoma With Novel AAV Therapy
Manali Kamdar, MD, on Acclimating to Routine CAR T Practice in the Field
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.